Tag Archives: “The Dead”

Reflection

“Charge of the Light Brigade” and “The Dead”

2 Comments

I read “The Charge of the Light Brigade” in my European History class in high school, and I really enjoyed it. I found our recent discussion in class interesting, but I have some differing viewpoints. First, I agree that the work is a eulogy that is meant to glorify the actions of the men who perished in combat. However, I disagree that the author is expressing the senselessness of the war. Tennyson is conveying that although the specific purposes of the war may not have been completely understood by the soldiers,  the men are willing to risk everything for the sake of their hopes, dreams, wishes, and country. To be clear, this sense of duty is not blind. The men are not aware of the exact political or strategic objectives at hand, but this is irrelevant to Tennyson’s purpose. The soldiers are willing to enter the dangerous war because they have individual, as well as nationalist, motivations. Their families and desires spur them to do everything in their power to protect the prospects of their futures, even if it means risking their lives. The battlefield might be a “valley of Death” or the “mouth of Hell,” yet the men enter it regardless.  Therefore, I view “The Charge of the Light Brigade” as a kind of nationalist piece solely meant to glorify the battle and inspire the populace.

I appreciate the contrast “The Dead” provides from the first poem.  It is notably a Shakespearean sonnet, and as a result, the diction is more melodic and poetic, and the tone is nostalgic and soothing. Even though the poem seems to be tranquil and serene, I feel that Brooke is subtly guilting and blaming society for the deaths of the soldiers. By glorifying the civilian aspect of the soldiers’ lives and exaggerating the joys of mundane occurrences, he insinuates that their deaths are meaningless. Since the men’s lives are cut short, they will never be able to experience simple pleasures such as “the stir of wonder,” “rich skies,” and “waves that dance.” At the poem’s conclusion, I feel slightly unsettled knowing that these men perished at preventable means.

Although “Charge of the Light Brigade” and “The Dead” discuss men in combat, the purpose of each are distinct. Tennyson extols the fallen soldiers in a nationalist manner, whereas Brooke suggests that promising lives are lost in meaningless wars. Determining the authors’ intents was somewhat challenging because it required noticing subtleties, but I enjoyed each poem and respect the differing perspectives.

Reflection

The Changed View of War: Reflection on “The Charge of the Light Brigade” and “The Dead”

1 Comment

Alfred Lord Tennyson’s poem, “The Charge of the Light Brigade” highlights a moment during the Crimean War where 600 British soldiers mistakenly charged heavily fortified Russian artillery forces after receiving incorrect orders. Subsequently, most of them died without having gained much during the attack. Rather than describing the pointless loss of life during that charge, Tennyson chooses to glorify the soldiers’ choice to courageously follow through with the orders without hesitation over its feasibility. Nowadays, we might refer to this as “blind obedience”, and would rarely declare it an act of valor. Instead, most of us would feel contempt towards the leader giving orders and pity for the soldiers who followed them. In the 19th century, the battlefield was considered just as much a place for nations to show off their “muscle” and military wit as it was to settle diplomatic disputes. Sixty years later, this mentality led to several European powers being eager to find an excuse to wage war with one another. When that excuse finally arrived and the First World War began, the mentality dramatically shifted as tens of thousands of people were dying every day without a clear reason as to why. War no longer seemed distant as the possibility of knowing someone who died in battle severely increased with each passing year. War became personal. Rupert Brooke describes it best in his poem “The Dead”. Brooke individualizes the perished troops and gives them a “story” to their lives. The poem consists of descriptions of very human experiences such as love and watching sunsets. He makes it very clear that all those who died in battle were not born soldiers. They shared the same experiences we have every day and would most likely continue those experiences for several more years had they not died in battle. Brooke highlights that any loss of life is cruel as it terminates the human experiences we all partake in. If anything, Brooke is trying to glorify the men who died based on how they lived rather than what they were doing when they died.

Reflection

“The Dead” & WWI poetry

Leave a comment

I chose to analyze “The Dead” by Rupert Brooke (although I’ll bring up “The Charge of the Light Brigade” if I run out of ideas before 10 minutes pass). At first glance, “The Dead” seems to fit the typical mold of a World War I poem, as it it appears to be a perversion of the classical poetry at the time. It is beautiful, lyrical, and mentions nature, yet its subject matter is death. While this is normal for a World War I poem, it does stand out in some ways from other WWI poetry. For one, many WWI poems address the reader as “you”, which Brooke does not do. This poem also seems to have more idealism than other WWI poetry. For example, CH Sorley also mentions victims of the war in his poem “When you see millions…”, but his poem is very dark and startling. This poem by Brooke only mentions the beautiful parts of life that these soldiers left behind, which idealizes them. (ugh sorry)

Reflection

Reflection on “The Dead”

Leave a comment

“The Dead” is a somber meditation on human loss. It is both reverent and mournful, celebrating the richness of life while echoing the utter emptiness felt in the wake of tragedy.

In contrast with the bold eulogizing tone of “The Charge of the Light Brigade”, “The Dead” concerns itself not with the honor of battle but rather with the emotional cost of war; the speaker focuses attention on the individuals lost in conflict, whose lives held meaning beyond the context of war and whose legacy is defined by sorrow rather than glory. Allusions to nature reinforce the ephemeral loveliness of life, the complexity and subtlety of which is broken by the jarring pivotal phrase “All this is ended now”. The final lines describe lively waters brought to stillness by frost, mirroring the quiet, sobering impact of war on both its victims and survivors.

This poem had a profound effect on me. I found myself unprepared for the mention of “a width, a shining peace, under the night” which drew the poem to a close by attaching gentle, natural imagery to the ending of life. While undeniably mournful, “The Dead” also conveys a sense of serenity in death, a bittersweet concept that lingers in the mind, deeply humbling and vaguely haunting.

Reflection

“The Charge of the Light Brigade” and “The Dead”: The Price of Glory

Leave a comment

While both “The Charge of the Light Brigade” and “The Dead” deal with war and the death that results from it, the poems present the loss of lives in two very different lights. “The Charge of the Light Brigade” starts at the beginning of a battle, detailing the events that occur in a glorious tale that is ripe with heroic sacrifice. Even the rhythm of the poem seems to be influenced by the spirit of war, as the stressed syllables create a tempo that resembles a trot. This work seems to criticize war a little, but poem’s intended purpose appears to be to celebrate the soldiers of the light brigade and to honor them as heroes.

On the other hand, “The Dead” employs longer lines and does not describe the events of a battle. The loss of the soldiers’ lives is not as glorified as it is in “The Charge of the Light Brigade”; in fact, the poem humanizes the combatants. They are no longer just the six hundred—they are individual people, and the time they have spent on the earth has been cut tragically short. Their memories and experiences have vanished as well, and “The Dead” mourns this loss much more than “The Charge of the Light Brigade” did.

Both poems use enjambment, but they seem to use it for different purposes. Perhaps “The Charge of the Light Brigade” uses these line endings to demonstrate the moments of suspense that occurred while “all the world wonder’d” (Tennyson 33), and perhaps “The Dead” uses it to mirror the abrupt ends to the soldiers’ lives? Finally, while “The Charge of the Light Brigade” ends with a cry that honors the soldiers as heroes and praises their endless glory, “The Dead” ends with a frost that settles over the water and leaves an “unbroken glory” (Brooke 13). As frost and winter often represent an end to the life that bloomed in the spring, this final glory is different than the one in the other poem, bringing about a more silent, peaceful end.

Sofia Yi

Reflection

“The Dead”-A Commentary on War

Leave a comment

WWI was unprecedented in its length and horrific character as thousands of soldiers died. Rupert Brooke takes an angle of humanizing the soldiers that can be contrasted by Alfred Lord Tennyson’s “The Charge of the Light Brigade,” which talks more generally of the role and fate of the solider.

While “The Dead” is short, the lines are long and each word provides meaning and tone. The poem does not seem to be referring to soldiers as soldiers but as human beings in what they have experienced and the beauty of life, which is contrasted by death. The first stanza uses romantic lines such as “dawn was theirs” and “felt the quick stir of wonder” and ends with the final words, in a curt 4 word sentence: “All this is ended.” While the rest of the lines of the first stanza flow together and are punctuated by commas, this last statement stands out clearly to show what has been lost. It is of interest that the first stanza does not focus on only the beautiful things in life but also the very human, vulnerable aspects of a full life, as Brooke says, the lost beings were “washed marvelously with sorrow,” demonstrating that life’s sweetness comes from sorrow and joy.

The second stanza moves away from the soldiers and personifies “Frost” as a being that “stays the waves that dance,” which is sort of a bringer of death. Brooke does not describe the death cruelly but rather cold and honourable, shown by the “Frost” leaving “a shining peace, under the night.”  Brooke plies at the emotions of the reader, humanizes the soldier as a being who experienced all that life has to offer but was put out like a flame by a cold but honourable death.

 

-Lauren

Reflection

War vs. Death

Leave a comment

After reading both “The Charge of the Light Brigade” by Alfred Lord Tennyson and “The Dead” by Rupert Brooke, I have found that “The Dead” is actually more about life. The former focuses on a battle where 600 soldiers were killed. The latter focuses on the life and the happinesses in life of the deceased. Both poems are about wars and both are memorials to the deceased soldiers. However, Tennyson has a focus on the battle itself and the “shots”, “shells”, and “mouth of Hell” associated with war and battle. Brooke writes about the “joys”, “flowers”, “and wandering loveliness” of the lives of the soldiers. Brooke is able to paint a beautiful picture of life and happiness. Tennyson’s piece has lots of imagery of war and death. Tennyson never mentions the soldiers individually; he only refers to them as “the six hundred”. Brooke, as well, does not mention any soldiers individually, but his piece humanizes the soldiers as people rather than just as dead soldiers.

After reading both pieces, I tend to like “The Dead” because of its focus on life and joys of life. I appreciate “The Charge of the Light Brigade” as it is a beautiful eulogy to the battle. However, I like how “The Dead” doesn’t even mention death, but is a celebration of life.

 

Dani

Reflection

“The Dead” vs. “The Charge of the Light Brigade”

Leave a comment

One of the main differences between “The Dead” and “The Charge of the Light Brigade” is that Tennyson’s poem glorifies war whereas Brooke doesn’t necessarily do that as much in his poem. Tennyson writes about the Battle of Balaclava in 1854 which is regarded as an instance of military incompetence. However, the only time he touches on that is in line 12 when he writes, “some one had blunder’d:” In actuality Tennyson paints a pretty horrific picture of the battlefield by using phrases such as the “valley of Death” (7), “the mouth of Hell” (24), and the “jaws of Death” (25). He also utilizes anaphora of certain words like “cannon” and “flash’d” to demonstrate just how surrounded the light brigade was by the weapons. By doing this he’s emphasizing the bravery and courage of the soldiers for charging into this environment, despite the mistake their commander made earlier. Tennyson’s poem glorifies and justifies war where there was military inefficiency and human loss.

“The Dead”, on the other hand, focuses much more on the individual soldiers and the loss of the lives they had to live. Brooke acknowledges the inevitability of death since the poem going from the morning dusk to the night at the end seems to symbolize the progression of life. However, Brooke emphasizes the soldiers’ innocence as he describes them has having “hearts were women of human joys and cares” (1), and leaving an “unbroken glory, a gathered radiance” (13). He also doesn’t indict war nor does he glorify it as Tennyson does. Although he acknowledges the sadness that comes with war and death, he also sees beauty during that time with the “waters blown by changing winds to laughter/And lit by the rich skies, all day” (9-10). After reading the two poems I don’t think that one necessarily depicts war better than the other. They both represent different sides of war and different opinions towards war in different time periods. As we discussed in class, “The Dead” was written around WWI where there were more casualties and more civilians experienced the pain of losing a family member – who wasn’t necessarily groomed to have a military career – to war, so it explains the more humanistic views towards war. Tennyson’s poem, on the other hand, was written during a time when there weren’t so many casualties, the soldiers were more or less aristocratic and the wars not as major.

-Julia