Category Archives: Uncategorized

Theory on the ending of Hard-Boiled Wonderland

In Hard-Boiled Wonderland and the End of the World, the ending is rather ambiguous. In class, we discussed a couple of different ideas, but eventually just agreed that it was intentionally left ambiguous; everyone could get something different from it. In this post, I’m going to share what I got from the ending of this book.

My own personal theory is that if the main character had joined his shadow in escaping the End of the World, he would have woken up in the real world and not been trapped in his own consciousness. The professor did not mention this possibility, because he only works in the realm of science. The thought that the main character could choose to leave the End of the World would not have occurred to him as a scientific possibility, because the human mind cannot be predicted scientifically. If the main character had made the decision to jump into the pool, he would have basically chosen to break free of the world his mind had created. However, I think we are supposed to realize that this actually isn’t possible, simply because the main character doesn’t have the willpower to leave the world that he created. As the shadow says, it is his own world, of course he thinks he cannot leave it.

Gender Relativity in “The Cure”

We talked a lot about oppression – especially of Baby – in “The Cure” during class. However, I want to discuss the gender dynamic Kamani explores in the work. It seems pretty obvious that Baby lives in a highly patriarchal society, and that Dr. Doctor is a prime example of the power men have. First and foremost, Dr. Doctor sexually abuses Baby under the guise of medicine. Medicine gives Dr. Doctor an uninhibited authority that allows him to do such things – even  Baby’s mother, who is supposed to be her guardian, turns a blind eye to what Dr. Doctor does as he “extracts Baby’s bodily fluids” to cure her tallness. However, the gender dynamic becomes more interesting because Kamani seems to intentionally draw parallels between Dr. Doctor’s and Baby’s appearances. They are both tall and thin. However, Dr. Doctor’s tallness is an asset as it gives him authority as a doctor as he towers over all the other characters in the short story. Baby, on the other hand, is seen as “demonic” and deformed because of her tallness. Men and women in society are clearly held up to different standards and Baby’s tallness becomes the very thing that alienates her from society. There’s nothing physically unsound with Baby, but society treats her as if there is because she towers over others where she should be shorter than them. Not only are women expected to be socially inferior, but they are also expected to be physically shorter as well. I thought it was really interesting how Kamani weaved this into the story because it gives us a visualization of just how differently men and women are viewed.

Major and Minor Characters in Breakfast of Champions

It’s really interesting what Vonnegut does with all of his characters in Breakfast of Champions. Everyone in his novel gets their own “time in the limelight,” and gets to share parts of their backstory and perspective. This goes back to the ideas that Vonnegut expressed in his interview: he wanted his novel to be like a mythological story, and he wanted to abolish the distinction between major and minor characters. We are able to connect a little bit more with all of his characters because of the tidbits of personality we learn about them and, as a result, everyone becomes a major character. Or perhaps everybody becomes a minor character? When I read the book, I couldn’t really empathize much with any of the characters, including Kilgore and Dwayne, who the story revolved around the most. Even the omniscient and omnipotent narrator of the story didn’t have as much control over the path the novel was going down as I expected him to have. In a humorous ending to the book, the narrator was going to prove himself as Kilgore Trout’s maker and reveal all to him but was suddenly attacked Kazak the dog, who he claimed was originally the “main character” of the story. Although he eventually showed Trout his powers, it seems unusual that even the writer could not have anticipated everything that happened in the story. Just like in Trout’s story, it appears as though most of the characters in the novel are just machines that lack free will, and are unable to do anything outside of their programming. In the end, Vonnegut is calling into question whether or not we truly have free will through the carefully defined yet somewhat equal-in-power roles he has assigned to all the character machines in his novel.

-Sofia Yi

Cut-Ups and Their Role in Nova Express

Some of my cut-ups include:

  • “The peering this way and to a time machine would object was forcibly maintained by <<The La Baba,>> a wormhole just before it the lawsuit.”
  • “On one occasion the refusal to malshape of the oil jars in the back reaction only takes attached to Salim’s wall.”
  • “An example is air in General Stern travel: physicists have to Salim in the stomach, table expand, then a big nose and theory, both of which are at Bagram.”

The cut-up technique also plays an important role in Nova Express. Not only is it responsible for making some humorous paragraphs about insect people and the Gods that live in the cool spots of Venus, but it reflects the overall tone of the novel as well. Throughout their varied and slightly nonsensical journeys, the Nova Police appear to be fighting against corruption in governments and in societies. As a result, many of the themes of the book go back to control, or the lack thereof. I remember one passage in particular, about how negative thoughts are replayed over and over again until they eat you from the inside and you’re nothing but a shell of hatred and resentment. How much control do we really have over our minds? Perhaps the cut-up technique is also used to emphasize this idea of our lack of control; by piecing together random parts of other texts, Burroughs is basically relinquishing some of his control over the meaning and message of the novel and leaving it up to chance. However, as humans, we are still hard-wired to try to convince ourselves that there is some sort of meaning even when there isn’t. Do we lack control over our roles in society and merely try to convince ourselves that we don’t? Am I, at this very moment, also trying to find a deeper meaning in a text where there is none? Either way, we are ultimately left with a strange, semi-coherent amalgam of words that has the potential of being infinitely profound… or not.

-Sofia Yi

DDT and the Environment in the 20th Century

DDT (dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane) was a popularly used insecticide in the 1940s, first in WWII and then in agriculture. In the 1950s, it was used to combat the spread of malaria by killing mosquitoes, but this project failed in tropical regions. Its widespread usage also caused high rates of DDT resistance in mosquitoes. American scientists were concerned with the possible dangers of DDT since it first began being used, but this issue did not gain attention until Rachel Carson published Silent Spring in 1962. This book claimed that pesticides, including DDT, were causing great harm to the environment and human health. Soon after, Silent Spring garnered great public attention, ad JFK ordered the investigation of Carson’s claims. The EDF (Environmental Defense Fund) was created with the aim to ban the use of DDT, which was discovered to be toxic to marine organisms and a chief cause of the thinning of birds’ eggshells. Its comprehensive uses were banned in 1972, but DDT is still used for disease vector control. For example, DDT is sprayed on the inside walls of houses to kill or repel mosquitoes, and this method supposedly greatly reduces environmental damage.

DDT is thought to be the major cause of the decline of birds of prey like bald eagles and peregrine falcons. Egg shell thinning makes the birds more susceptible to embryo deaths and egg breakage. DDT’s are also chemically similar to estrogens and can cause hormonal changes in animals. Thus, it is believed they also damage the reproductive system and decrease reproductive success. Some speculate that DDT is carcinogenic, but the CDC reports otherwise. Additionally, there is an ongoing debate between people who oppose the use of DDT for malaria control due to environmental concerns and those who support its use in order to save more livess. Regardless, the use of DDT is frowned upon in the US and most nations, yet it is still used in controlled manners.

Development of Pharmaceuticals in the 20th Century

In 1900 the three main causes of death in the US were pneumonia, tuberculosis, and diarrhea. In 2000, the odds of dying from any one of these was 1 in 25 but only pneumonia remains in the list of the top 10 causes of death today. This can be attributed to the rise of better sanitation and vaccination techniques but the development of drugs also had a major role.

Pharmaceuticals began primarily with apothecary shops in the 19th century but a few preliminary drugs were discovered such as epinephrine, nor epinephrine, and barbiturates. In the post WWII period, several other antibiotics were produced and vaccines made for measles, rubella and mumps. Antihypertensive drugs and oral contraceptives were made as well. The Kefauver-Harris Amendment was passed in 1962 which enhanced drug regulation and forces manufacturers to prove that it was effective before a new drug went on market after thalidomide was shown to cause widespread birth defects in Europe. In the late 20th century statins such as simvastatin became a major development as they lowered cholesterol levels and reduced heart disease.

Overall the cost of the drug industry is extremely high. Industry wide research and investment cost $65.3 billion in 2009. It was also estimated that in 2003,  the cost for discovering, developing and launching a new drug over a 5 year period is $1.3 billion. However by 2010, development costs range from $4 billion to $11 billion per drug.

–Julia Ng

Computers in the 20th Century

The first electronic digital computer was created in the 1930s by John Vincent Atanasoff. While it wasn’t programmable, the machine could solve linear equations and used a paper card writer/reader as its storage mechanism. This machine established three rules that became the basis for future computers: it used binary digits to represent data, performed calculations electronically, and contained a system in which the computing and memory were separated. Although the computer was never fully developed due to Atanasoff’s leave from Iowa State College for World War II assignments, the 1930s also saw the creation of the first binary digital computers and the first programmable calculator, the Z2.

The creator of this calculator was a man named Konrad Zuse, who went on to create his next technological wonder that was aptly named the Z3. An electromechanical computer that became operational in 1941, the Z3 was the world’s first programmable, fully automatic digital computer. Later, the Z4 became the world’s first commercial digital computer.

As computers became increasingly sophisticated and increasingly widespread, organizations began to use them to simplify tasks and work more efficiently. Telephone exchange networks were converted into electronic data processing systems, and the US Navy had developed an electromechanical analog computer named the “Torpedo Data Computer,” which used trigonometry to solve the problem of firing a torpedo at a moving target. The world’s first electronic digital programmable computer, the Colossus, was also built for the purpose of World War II. The Colossus was designed by engineer Thomas Flowers for the purpose of cracking German codes.

In the 1950s, the first computer designed to aid US businesses was created. Eckert and Mauchly created the UNIVAC, or UNIVersal Automatic Computer. Instead of punched cards, it used magnetic tape storage to aid in data collection. This machine was used by J. Lyons & Company to calculate the company’s weekly payroll. The first home computer, the Altair 8800, is not marketed to the public until 1975. At the cost of $400, hobbyists could own their very own machine that did not include a keyboard, monitor, or its own programming language. However, two young men decided to try their hands at writing a coding language for the new computer. Their names were Bill Gates and Paul Allen, and they started the project by forming a partnership called Microsoft. Soon after, Apple Computer, founded by electronics hobbyists Steve Jobs and Steve Wozniak, releases the Apple II, a desktop personal computer for the mass market that amazingly featured a keyboard, video monitor, mouse, and random-access memory (RAM).

What started as an enormous machine that could only solve simple math problems soon blossomed into something truly life-changing. Computers became more and more complex over time, and it took less than a century for them to integrate into the public’s daily life. Computers are easy to use, and they make tasks easier. The Internet allows us to share information with each other at a staggering speed that was impossible just a few years ago. This technological innovation has opened up a vast world of knowledge and information for everyone in the modern world. Where will all of this advancement lead, you ask? Well, we haven’t come up with an algorithm for that just yet.

-Sofia

Semi-Coherent Sentences of In-Class Cut-up

1. After more than 50 years and strength to legitimize atte[ndance] and began to tap on disorder, Keith Connors.
2. Severely hyperactive and thousands of men, once shunned, angry-looking bird with a recognized as having a have taken part in problem.
3. Doctors against the pressure of accepted drugs like Addeen turning the parta to temper in the parcel on the desk; helping youngsters succeed who will throw a beyond.
4. A traffic light gonged; disorder had soared to 3 democracy’s big 100,000 in 1990.
5. Medication often assuaged, but our will is great; impulsiveness and I in his mouth, dropped, allowing a person’s under-intelligence to emerge.

There were a few more that might pass off as understandable, but these were by far the best ones.

Have fun with them!
Ricky Lozoya

Cybernetics

Cybernetics and systems science as academic domains were founded in the 1940s and 1950s. Cybernetic systems are defined as systems that are complicated, adaptive, and self-regulating. Systems science is a broader domain that encompasses cybernetics and other systems. Systems science theory states that however complex the world may seem, we can organize it into systems. Therefore, we can find general rules that apply to all systems.  Systems theory focuses on the structure of these systems, while cybernetics focuses more on how they work. These two domains are often studied together, as they both focus on information, feedback, and communication.

-Audrey

Source: http://pespmc1.vub.ac.be/CYBSWHAT.html

 

Gojira and Peaceful Japan: How People Worried and Learned to Hate the Bomb

Unlike its sequels (American and Japanese), the very first Godzilla (Gojira in Japan) film was, not only about the fantastically epic monster-man battle, but also centered around the morality of using weapons of mass destruction. Truthfully, using an ancient dinosaur-dragon beast is a particularly strange way of highlighting such a serious topic, but if anyone has the right to talk about the human cost of WMD’s, it’s Japan. At the time this film was released, Hiroshima and Nagasaki had only just been bombed nearly a decade prior and reconstruction (emotional, psychological, and physical) were still taking place. So it makes sense that several of the scenes within the film seem to mirror what Hiroshima and Nagasaki looked like after being obliterated and many pieces of dialogue amongst the characters reflected the opinions of several scientists working on the Manhattan Project.

In the film, Gojira destroys a large portion of Tokyo, leaving smoldering remains and orphaned children that seem eerily reminiscent of the results of a nuclear explosion. In addition, the movie played around with the idea that in order to deal with an unstoppable, destructive force like Gojira (who is an embodiment of a nuclear weapon) another unstoppable, destructive force needed to be deployed. This mirrors the arms race on a small scale; the fear that no one entity can or should control such a destructive force and the only solution is to arm at least one other entity with an equally powerful destructive force. In the case of the movie, it was a WMD that sucked the oxygen out of water and destroyed all organic matter. The creator did not want to use it as a weapon, for fear that it would spark an even more intense arms race from that which was already going on between the USSR and the U.S. He was so afraid that many innocent people would be killed if his invention were to be used for some geopolitical goal that he chose to destroy his life’s work and die rather than leave a single trace of his weapon.

So what’s the message? Nuclear weapons are bad? That was already an established fact (especially to Japan), so why make a film highlighting it? I believe the Ishiro Honda, the director, wanted us to instead focus on the human reaction to a devastating attack. When a WMD